Sunday, January 27, 2013

McCain: Immigration plan to have pathway to citizenship

Two senators at the center of negotiations over comprehensive immigration reform, Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) and Sen. Bob Menendez (D-N.J.) said on Sunday that a pathway to citizenship is an essential component of a comprehensive reform bill.

"That has to be also part of it," McCain told ABC News' Martha Raddatz on "This Week" when asked whether a pathway to citizenship would be a component of reform. "There's a new appreciation on both sides of the aisle including, maybe more importantly on the Republican side of the aisle, that we have to enact comprehensive immigration reform."

Like "This Week" on Facebook here. You can also follow the show on Twitter here.

McCain said that a small group of Senators will release the principles of a comprehensive, not "piecemeal," reform bill this week.

"I'm very pleased with the progress," McCain said. "It's not that much different from what we tried to do in 2007."

Read a full transcript of the interview with Sens. McCain and Menendez HERE.

Menendez, who met with President Obama on Friday along with other members of the Congressional Hispanic Caucus leadership, said that the president expressed his full commitment to reform.

"The president made it very clear in that discussion that this was a top legislative priority for him in this session of the Congress and that he expects to work with all of us in an effort to achieve that goal and he's fully committed to it."

He added that a pathway to "earned legalization" is an "essential element" of an immigration reform bill.

"First, Americans support it in poll after poll. Secondly, Latino voters expect it. Thirdly Democrats want it. And fourth Republicans need it," Menendez said.

McCain added that he believes Obama's use of the presidential podium on behalf of immigration reform at an event in Las Vegas planned for Tuesday will aid efforts to pass a bill.

"I think it helps," McCain said. "I think its important that we all work together on this."

"Believe it or not, I see a glimmer of bipartisanship out there," he added.

Also Read

Source: http://news.yahoo.com/senate-immigration-proposal-pathway-citizenship-152655874--abc-news-politics.html

Home Based Business Opportunities: Easy Online Jobs -Paid Surveys

Sorry, Readability was unable to parse this page for content.

Source: http://boynamalikas.blogspot.com/2013/01/home-based-business-opportunities-easy.html

hilary rosen grilled cheese allen west north korea missile nerlens noel don t trust the b in apartment 23 world financial center

CES 2013 through the eyes of our contest winner (video)

Many entered, but it was Daniel Orren who sent in a great green-screened video that snagged him a temporary spot on the Engadget crew at this year's CES. Hanging with the team in our trusty trailer, getting comped meals, roaming the floor, wearing mind-controlled cat ears -- honestly, it's probably just easier to list all of the things the photographer didn't do the other week in Vegas.

With the dust settled, we asked Orren how he enjoyed the trip. "The showroom floor was a lot bigger than I had anticipated originally, so naturally this was great as there were more gadgets." Amongst the highlights: "My favorite times would have to be hanging with the Engadget crew, it's nice just chatting with everyone about all the cool stuff you've seen that day/week and just geeking out." And as for that inevitable question, the one we ask ourselves right around this time each year, " I'd love to go back to CES if given the chance, and who knows, maybe I'll just go on my own in a few years."

Also included in the prize package was an Engadget Show segment to call his very own. When he wasn't occupied with the Steambox and 4K TVs, our film crew was following Orren around to find out what it's like going to CES as a first-timer. Check in after the break for the results.

This segment originally appeared in episode 40 of The Engadget Show.

Comments

Source: http://www.engadget.com/2013/01/26/ces-2013-contest-winner/

Saturday, January 26, 2013

You Will Spend 43 Days on Hold in Your Life

What's a reasonable time to be put on hold when you call customer service? A few minutes? Five? Ten? Well all those minutes add up because over a course of a lifetime, the average person will be on hold for 43 days. Yeah. Forty. Three. Days. More »


Source: http://feeds.gawker.com/~r/gizmodo/full/~3/uMeFzwAnhgQ/you-will-spend-43-days-on-hold-in-your-life

bridesmaids winning lottery numbers megamillions winner kansas jayhawks mega millions results louisville lotto numbers

Genealogy's Star: Editing entries in FamilySearch Family Tree


Most of the information contained in FamilySearch.org's Family Tree program can be edited or, in some cases, deleted by any registered user. This includes most of the personal information about individuals and the relationships between individuals. The ability to edit or delete information is not limited to the people who contributed the information. In Family Tree's predecessor program,?New.FamilySearch.org, everyone "owned" the information they personally contributed and no one else could edit the submitted information. If the information was inaccurate or inappropriate, the only response was to add more, hopefully, accurate information. But all the information, both accurate and inaccurate, was preserved at the same level and availability.? Family Tree changes this scenario dramatically. Any registered user can edit (or where allowed) delete any information. Not just the information they personally contributed.? Whenever I present this function of the program in any class, there are always the same two questions. These are:
  • If anyone can change the information then why doesn't the whole database devolve into chaos or fill up with garbage? (Integrity of the database)
  • Do you mean to say that anyone can change my family information? (Ownership of the data)
Usually, my explanations of these two issues does not satisfy those asking the question. The issue of the ownership of genealogical data is extremely ingrained in the psyche of the average genealogist. I find the attitude of ownership to be almost pervasive. Researchers have a tendency to think of the information they find to be "their" data. It is relatively easy to point out that all of the descendants "own" their own ancestry, so no one ancestor is owned by any one of the descendants. Although this simple explanation is true, an attitude of possession is hard to overcome. Well, whether or not you or anyone else believes they own their genealogical data, Family Tree still allows anyone to make changes. So this issue has more to do with participation in the program at all, rather than affecting the manner in which the information is edited.? The remaining question concerning the integrity of the data is a little more difficult to address. It is true that allowing anyone to edit data in a database would intuitively seem to move the data towards chaos. But in fact, as counter-intuitive as it may be, allowing everyone to edit the data raises the overall reliability of the data. The reason this occurs is dictated by basic human nature. There are two factors; some people are driven to correct the world around them and most people could care less. In other words, it a lot more likely that people possessing the correct information about the people in Family Tree will be motivated to edit and update the data than those who do not care about either genealogy or Family Tree. This is the premise that makes the wiki-based programs work where registered users can make changes. Family Tree is not strictly a wiki but it does have wiki-like characteristics.? In fact this is the case. Counter intuitively; the information in a wiki (or a wiki-like) program becomes more reliable rather than less reliable. But this brings up another common question: What happens if I change the information and then someone changes it back and then I change it again and so forth? Although this might happen, Family Tree has several layers of features that make this type of disagreement (commonly called a ?revert war?) highly unlikely. First of all, anyone can ?watch? any ancestor in Family Tree. Watching an ancestor initiates a process where the program notifies the user of any changes to the watched individual. Secondly, and more importantly, the program allows for communication between users through email. Obviously, if there is a difference in the data offered for any individual, the users can communicate and come to an understanding concerning the ?correct? data to be entered. Finally, abuses of the program can be reported to FamilySearch. If the users carefully rely on sources, then the possibility of any disagreements will be minimized. If in the end, there is a genuine disagreement about a certain item, then the family will have to ?agree to disagree? and get on with additional research to resolve the controversy. Unfortunately, many of the duplications and errors in New.FamilySearch.org have been inherited by Family Tree. It may take some time to work through these errors, but ultimately, through the editing mechanism of the Family Tree program all of those errors can be corrected and information mutually acceptable to the family can be maintained. Another comment I get at this point in teaching classes concerns the need to correct the duplications and errors in the program. The answer is yes, we are the ones who must start the work of correcting the information in Family Tree. We all hope we have more than one person per family to do the work.?

Source: http://genealogysstar.blogspot.com/2013/01/editing-entries-in-familysearch-family.html

tesla model s tesla model s act Black Ops 2 Secede ben roethlisberger Diwali

Unauthorized unlocking of mobile phones set to be - Financial Post

On Saturday, Americans will have to get permission before trying to get their phones ?unlocked?.

In October 2012, a change to the US Digital Millineum Copyright Act (DMCA) allowed cell phone owners to temporarily unlock their cellphones without having to ask their network provider first.

What this meant for consumers was that they had a strict 90-day time limit to unlock their phones without having to ask. Prior to this, cell phone users would have to pay a fee to their service provider to get their cellphones unlocked for usage on other networks. If you unlock a cell phone without permission after Saturday you could be in violation of the DMCA.

Unlocking phones gives users the ability to freely skirt things such as roaming fees while traveling abroad or paying exorbitant fees for using other carrier services.

An online petition is trying to reach a goal of 100,000 signatures to make the Librarian of Congress ? who determines exemptions to the DMCA ? rescind this decision to end the time limit. The petition?s ultimate goal is to make unlocking permanently legal.

So far 5,272 people have signed the petition. The deadline for it is February 23, 2013.

A number of U.S. cell phone companies already provide unlocked handsets, but many are unable to be locked. There are two systems for locking phones onto a specific provider, according to HowStuffWorks: Global System for Mobile communication (GSM) and Code Division Multiple Access (CDMA). If you have a CDMA phone then the unlocking process is done directly through the provider, but if you have a GSM phone then the unlocking process is done through switching SIM cards.

Source: http://business.financialpost.com/2013/01/25/unauthorized-unlocking-of-mobile-phones-set-to-be-illegal-in-u-s/

Celeste Holm Stephen Covey klimt bastille day breaking bad breaking bad food network star

FitLinks: Exercise Everday May Keep Flu Away - BuiltLean

flu exercise excuse ss FitLinks: Exercise Everday May Keep Flu Away With so much discussion about how terrible the is flu this year, wouldn?t it be great if there was something besides just getting a vaccine that could help you ward it off? Well, the great news is?you can! Exercise can help boost your immune system and give you a whole host of other benefits that will help you stay healthy!

Some of the other articles featured this week also discuss the flu, as well as what foods nutritionists would never put on their plates, and why liking your job means that your diet and overall health might be much better than average. We hope some of the information here helps you keep your health through the cold!

Please Note: The articles and videos listed below are informative, popular, newsworthy, or a combination of all three. Just because we have included an article within FitLinks does not necessarily mean that BuiltLean supports, or agrees with its contents or views. If you have a question about our position on any article, please leave a comment and we will be happy to respond!

TRENDING NEWS

1. Exercise Everday May Keep Flu Away (CBS)

2. Sugar And Calories Cut In Soft Drinks (Medical News Today)

3. Sweetened, Diet Drinks Tied To Depression Risk (Medical News Today)

4. Boosting Your Flu Shot Response With Exercise (NY Times)

5. Housecall For Health: New Post Meal Exercise Benefits (Fox News Radio)

TRENDING ARTICLES

1. The 21 Most Inspiring Health and Fitness Mantras (Greatist)

2. In U.S., Engaged Employees Exercise More, Eat Healthier (Gallup)

3. Classical Music Best During Exercise (Deccan Herald)

4. Unhealthiest Foods: What Nutrition Experts Won?t Eat (Huffington Post)

5. The Truth for Tall Lifters (T Nation)

TRENDING VIDEOS

Badass 63-Year-Old Woman Powerlifter Takes Home Gold at First Competition (Gizmodo)

VN:F [1.9.17_1161]

Rating: 5.0/5 (1 vote cast)

FitLinks: Exercise Everday May Keep Flu Away, 5.0 out of 5 based on 1 rating

Source: http://www.builtlean.com/2013/01/26/exercise-everyday-may-keep-flu-away/

Girl Meets World Jason Babin Nolan Daniels angus t. jones monday night football monday night football SEC Championship Game 2012